ллллллл     л        л  ллллллллл  л лллллллл
	       л       л    л        л  л          ллл     лл
	      л         л   л        л  л          л       лл
	      ллллллллллл   л        л  л          л
	      л         л   л        л  л          л
	      л         л    л      л   л          л
	      л         л     лллллл    ллллллллл  л



	лллллллл  ллллллл   л      л  ллллл   л    л    ллллл    л
	    л    л       л  л      л  л    л  лл   л   л     л   л
	    л    л       л  л      л  ллллл   л л  л  л       л  л
      л     л    л       л  л      л  л  л    л  л л  ллллллллл  л
      л     л    л       л  л      л  л   л   л   лл  л       л  л
       ллллл      ллллллл    лллллл   л    л  л    л  л       л  лллллл
       

       Distributed By The American Virus Creation and Research Society
ФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФФ
			 Restricting California BBS
	The California Alliance for Consumer Protection has proposed new
legislation to descriminate against California BBS.  The CACP has proposed
that there should be an established logon criterion which must be followed
by all California BBS.  The CACP addresses the distrobution of adult
material in California.  The CACP mentions the billing procedure for a BBS.
Finally, the CACP discusses the professional requirements of BBS in
California.
	Regarding the logon procedures, the proposed legislation states
that the theme of a BBS must be made available before a new user is
required to enter their personal information.
	The CACP states that BBS must provide "parental control devices
designed to make sure children do not gain access to adult information."
In other words, California BBS must constantly make sure that, even though
the adult user has been verified once, Sysops must still, somehow, make sure
that minors do not gain access to adult areas.  This is the descrimination,
for when an adult magazine or an adult film is sold, the vender does not
have an obligation to follow the whereabouts of the magazine or video.
	The CACP proposes that, if you are a sysop and want to charge for
peoples use of your investment, you must provide a viable way for the user
to contact you.  Namely, you must provide a voice telephone number, address
at which you can be mailed letters, the address of your business or house,
and finally, you must have a business license.
	The above legislation has already been presented to the legislature,
and will be revieved this month (January).  The sysops in California can
send letters to their lobbyists, and hope that this dictatious proposal
will not pass.
					The AVCR Team